A fecal transplant via nasogastric tube is possibly the most disgusting medical procedure I’ve ever contemplated. Bonus points for the phrase “donor stool.”
Via Aetiology
A fecal transplant via nasogastric tube is possibly the most disgusting medical procedure I’ve ever contemplated. Bonus points for the phrase “donor stool.”
Via Aetiology
This entry was posted on Monday, December 17th, 2007 at 11:51 am and is filed under Critters, Discovery, Health, Poop Power. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Theme: Contempt by Vault9.
Blog at WordPress.com.
Peter, I commend to your atotneitn a book that may well be available in your public library: Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory by David Ray Griffin. In this book, Professor Griffin meticulously exposes the fallacies contained in the Popular Mechanics article and subsequent book. He also demonstrates major faults in reports and stories put out by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (a.k.a. NIST, a branch of the US Department of Commerce, therefore a political organisation), the New York Times, Vanity Fair and Time magazine. NIST itself has subsequently disavowed some of the debunking claims made in the Popular Mechanics series.I would be happy to lend you my copy of this book if you will contact me. Peter, as a journalist and science reporter, you owe it to yourself and to your readers to expose yourself to information that just may contradict the Establishment view on scientific matters. Before you formulate a theory, you must first look at the facts of the matter.But we’re really not talking about facts here, are we? We’re talking about world view, or Weltanschauung, as the Germans put it. My job and career does not depend on my adopting a particular world view. You, on the other hand, are an establishment journalist, and the funding for this excellent site is very much Establishment dependent, coming as it does from the Royal Society. These factors inevitably affect what one believes, or at least professes to believe. I must add that I am encouraged by your support of Wikileaks, which, while a safe view to hold in New Zealand, would not be regarded as such even in Australia.
Phillip Rosenz911truth.org