<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How quickly nature falls into revolt when gold becomes her object!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theoystersgarter.com/2008/08/28/gold-for-salmon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theoystersgarter.com/2008/08/28/gold-for-salmon/</link>
	<description>Science served wet and salty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miriam Goldstein</title>
		<link>http://theoystersgarter.com/2008/08/28/gold-for-salmon/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Miriam Goldstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoystersgarter.wordpress.com/?p=643#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>Kirsten - Thanks for the inside info. I didn&#039;t realize that Pebble Mine still needed its own permits. Blarg for voting for mining over clean water, but maybe there is still hope...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirsten &#8211; Thanks for the inside info. I didn&#8217;t realize that Pebble Mine still needed its own permits. Blarg for voting for mining over clean water, but maybe there is still hope&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://theoystersgarter.com/2008/08/28/gold-for-salmon/#comment-2025</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoystersgarter.wordpress.com/?p=643#comment-2025</guid>
		<description>Pardon the length and repetition in that post. I just got back from Europe and jet lag unnnnhhhh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon the length and repetition in that post. I just got back from Europe and jet lag unnnnhhhh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirsten</title>
		<link>http://theoystersgarter.com/2008/08/28/gold-for-salmon/#comment-2024</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theoystersgarter.wordpress.com/?p=643#comment-2024</guid>
		<description>On one hand: UGH NOOOO!!!!!!
On the other hand: the vote was about general water standards for any new mine, and was not a direct approval of the Pebble Mine. They still need to get permits, and most residents are against that, so it may not happen.

This was a constant source of TV ads while we were living in Anchorage last year, and despite this vote, I&#039;d be surprised if Pebble got its permits any time soon. Most residents are opposed to the mine. OTOH, I don&#039;t actually know whether the permits will depend on a popular vote.

In particular, the Native Alaskans are largely against it, since the land/water downstream is vital for subsistence living as well as commercial fishing -- but apparently the proposed site is state land, not Native Corporation land, so they may not have much of a say. Even though a large part of their food source is going to be poisoned with fun chemicals. Sure, the local residents will have new job opportunities, but I&#039;m guessing the cost of having all their food flown in would offset the wage gains. In the end, I know they&#039;ll mine the area eventually, because who&#039;s really going to leave that much gold in the ground forever? But I hope it will wait at least until the technology and/or process get better for the land and residents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On one hand: UGH NOOOO!!!!!!<br />
On the other hand: the vote was about general water standards for any new mine, and was not a direct approval of the Pebble Mine. They still need to get permits, and most residents are against that, so it may not happen.</p>
<p>This was a constant source of TV ads while we were living in Anchorage last year, and despite this vote, I&#8217;d be surprised if Pebble got its permits any time soon. Most residents are opposed to the mine. OTOH, I don&#8217;t actually know whether the permits will depend on a popular vote.</p>
<p>In particular, the Native Alaskans are largely against it, since the land/water downstream is vital for subsistence living as well as commercial fishing &#8212; but apparently the proposed site is state land, not Native Corporation land, so they may not have much of a say. Even though a large part of their food source is going to be poisoned with fun chemicals. Sure, the local residents will have new job opportunities, but I&#8217;m guessing the cost of having all their food flown in would offset the wage gains. In the end, I know they&#8217;ll mine the area eventually, because who&#8217;s really going to leave that much gold in the ground forever? But I hope it will wait at least until the technology and/or process get better for the land and residents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
