http://theoystersgarter.com/2009/05/21/missing-link-or-media-stink/ Science served wet and salty Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:19:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ http://theoystersgarter.com/2009/05/21/missing-link-or-media-stink/#comment-13729 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:04:47 +0000 http://theoystersgarter.com/?p=1617#comment-13729 I could have ever understood why someone has dealt so qualifierly with this effect. Now give up to me full circle. Genuinely interesting your thesis. Although my English language is not so skillful, your post I can understand. Keep up the Sun.

]]> http://theoystersgarter.com/2009/05/21/missing-link-or-media-stink/#comment-3794 Fri, 22 May 2009 02:51:11 +0000 http://theoystersgarter.com/?p=1617#comment-3794 Public Library of Science, the open-access journal in which the fossil description was published.

]]> http://theoystersgarter.com/2009/05/21/missing-link-or-media-stink/#comment-3793 Fri, 22 May 2009 02:47:11 +0000 http://theoystersgarter.com/?p=1617#comment-3793 what’s PLOS?

]]> http://theoystersgarter.com/2009/05/21/missing-link-or-media-stink/#comment-3788 Thu, 21 May 2009 20:47:55 +0000 http://theoystersgarter.com/?p=1617#comment-3788 Sorry about that, Carl – it’s fixed now. And thanks for the great coverage of this story!

]]> http://theoystersgarter.com/2009/05/21/missing-link-or-media-stink/#comment-3787 Thu, 21 May 2009 20:21:43 +0000 http://theoystersgarter.com/?p=1617#comment-3787 Thanks for the post. Just a quick clarification–it was Ann Gibbons of Science who had trouble getting the paper. I got the paper after PLOS sent out a press release with a pdf link. My frustration was with the lack of outside comments on the fossil. That’s when I picked up the phone.

]]>