Good news (for once)

April 6, 2009

 

Most of us know that the Yangtze River Dolphin or Baiji went extinct last year, a victim of living in the watershed of 10% of the world’s human population.

 And it’s hard to think that the world’s smallest dolphin, the Vaquita, isn’t next. Even though the 100-300 reproductive individuals left live within 100 miles of one of the highest concentration of marine biologists in the world (San Diego), WWF lists the Vaquita as the 2nd most endangered species in the world (behind the Javan Rhino).

But finally there’s some good news for coastal dolphins. A huge population of 6000 Irrawady River dolphins was surveyed last week in the Sundaban Islands, and they seem to be doing very well. Some coastal dolphin species are slaughtered by the thousands under the mistaken notion that they compete with fishermen (despite the best effort of that “Heroes” cheerleader Hayden Panettiere). But here, locals love their dolphins. They have fished cooperatively for centuries, dolphins scaring shoals of fish into nets on shore in one of the most remarkable instances of interspecies cooperative hunting in the world. (Goliath groupers and moray eels are the only marine-marine example recorded to date, check out the movies at the end of the article).


Happy Purim!

March 10, 2009

Today is Purim, the holiday where Jews are religiously OBLIGATED to get fershnikit. (and eat hamentaschen, just one of many Jew Pastry options.) And who knows fershnikit better than the Meshuggenah Men?

Via Yo, Yenta!


For the Love of Sharks Answers!

August 20, 2008

Time’s up!

Here are the answers to the somewhat leading quiz I dropped yesterday.

photo from the News-Journal Online.

1.) B: In the South Africa, the shark catch rate in the longline swordfish fishery dropped 36% when the fishery was required to switch from using J hooks with squid bait to wider circle hooks with fish bait.

A 36% decrease in dead sharks is great, and this result happened in Hawaii as well when fishers there were required to switch to circle hooks with fish bait. This would seem to indicate that circle hooks and fish bait are good for preventing shark bycatch… but hold on. The source paper for this quiz points out that studies have found that fish bait works, but circle hooks don’t. More research is being done, but the key ingredient here appears to be using mackerel as bait instead of squid.

2.) A: Before restrictions on shark finning were enacted, 76% and 64% of sharks were finned in the Hawaii tuna and swordfish fisheries.

This is a case of a regulation working. Before the 2000 state rule requiring fishers to bring back the entire shark carcass belonging to each fin, shark-finning was seen as a way to supplement income using shark bycatch. Heck, if you have a shark flopping around on your boat that you can make a couple bucks off of, why not kill it and take the fin. Then the regulation came along and all of a sudden there’s no money to be had from the shark fin unless you tote 1,000 pounds of worthless meat back to port. In 2006 91% and 93% of sharks were released alive in the same fisheries.

3.) C: In developing countries, shark catches went from 76,000 metric tons in 1950 to 575,031 metric tons in 2000.

It’s the biggest one of course. And that’s just the reported catches. Actual catches are probably much higher. Shark catch by weight in Chile fisheries went from 1000 tons in 1950 to over 10,000 ton in 2005. These shark exports from Chile and Peru go to fresh and frozen meat markets in Uruguay, Spain, Brazil and Colombia.

Photo from the NOAA

Photo from the NOAA

4.) C: To avoid injury and increase efficiency, crew kill the shark before removing shark fins.

Many species of shark survive being hooked and dragged on the boat. The study sites that most blue sharks survive being caught and can be returned to the water with a good chance of survival. That means they probably won’t sit still to be finned. I’m not sure how they do the actual killing, though.

5.) C: Out of nine attitudes found in the fishing industry, which of the following was the only one that was NOT identified anywhere the interviews were conducted? We want to minimize shark fishing mortality because we are concerned with overfishing.

The attitudes chart from the report includes this as a possible response, but there are no takers. What does that mean for shark conservation? I would guess that regulatory action and economic incentive are going to be far and away the best way to appeal to the world’s fishers … because they ain’t worried about running out of sharks.


For the Love of Sharks

August 19, 2008

Here at the New England Aquarium, shark week is never over. So come on down shark experts! Let’s play a shark game show!

Here in the Aquarium, shark bycatch means a game of tag.

Here in the Aquarium, shark bycatch means a game of tag.

What’s the topic? It’s the paper “Shark interactions in pelagic longline fisheries.” It was published in the May 22, 2007 issue of Marine Policy. One of the many co-authors is NEAQ shark expert John Mandleman, but it has a lot of other co-authors because it was a massive undertaking. Basically a team of researchers gathered worldwide shark bycatch data from regulatory agencies, company logbooks and interviews with fishers in major ports around the world. I picture an researcher with a clipboard furiously writing while Robert Shaw growls “fish like that swallow you whole.”

However, the results of this study are stunning to me. But then I’m just a l’il old me. Let’s see if they’re stunning to you. Riddle me this!

1.) In the South Africa, the shark catch rate in the longline swordfish fishery dropped 36% when ____.
A.
the Southeast Asian tsunami changed global migration patterns
B. the fishery was required to switch from using J hooks with squid bait to wider circle hooks with fish bait
C. Madonna adopted all the sharks

2.) Before restrictions on shark finning were enacted, 76% and 64% of sharks were finned in the ____ fisheries
A. Hawaii tuna and swordfish
B. Australia tuna and billfish
C. Mad Max Thunderdome

3.) In developing countries, shark catches went from 76,000 metric tons in 1950 to ____ metric tons in 2000.
A. 42
B. 77,000
C. 575,031

4.) To avoid injury and increase efficiency, crew ____ before removing shark fins.
A. anesthetize the shark
B. wear suits of armor
C. kill the shark

5.) Out of nine attitudes found in the fishing industry, which of the following was the only one that was NOT identified anywhere the interviews were conducted?
A. Revenue from catching sharks is exceeded by costs from shark interactions.
B. Shark interactions are an expected and unavoidable part of longline fishing.
C. We want to minimize shark fishing mortality because we are concerned with overfishing.

So there you have it! I will post the correct answers in a future post … unless a shark accidentally eats me thinking I’m a seal. (See what I did there).


In an ocean far far away…

August 17, 2008
An ill-advised rebel sandlance attack on the humpback death star.

An ill-advised rebel sandlance attack on the humpback death star.

Thanks to Eric of The Other 95% and Eclectic Echoes for taking this fantastic image. He has more on his flickr stream.


One of the Garter’s Guests

August 16, 2008

Bwa ha ha ha ha! Scant days ago Miriam put out the call for guest bloggers to cover posting duties while she journeys to the center of the Earth. I made my services available, and since Miriam has a notorious weakness for the New England Aquarium, she said yes.

Do I blog? Yes I do.

But the blogging do here will be special. I have a mountain of scientific papers published by the crack NEAQ conservation and research departments that I am reading and trying to understand. I will be posting my blasé interpretation of those reports and aggregating (a.k.a. hurriedly googling and linking) the recent news involving those ocean issues.

I will also be making bad jokes, and I’ll probably drop a few LOL Oshunz along the way.

Do you like the sound of that? Hopefully you do, because we’re stuck together from at least the 16th to the 24th of August. Possibly longer if Miriam is detained by fanatical undersea mollusks:


MPA Madness: Beginnings on the South Coast for Marine Protection Areas

July 24, 2008

I know, I know, yet another CityBeat piece from me. But this one goes pretty directly to what Miriam and I want to do with this blog, which is talk about science and technology and how it applies to the world (along with pointing out some silliness along the way). This week I published a piece introducing readers to the Marine Life Protection Act, a law requiring the California Fish and Game Commission to draw a map of protected areas up and down the California coast. As you might imagine, that tends to be a controversial process. Here in southern California, the process is only just beginning, and the players are marshaling their forces.  I plan to cover how the MPAs are drawn as the committees meet as best I can. I realize that not all readers will be interested in that stuff, and that’s fine. All of the posts related to the MPAs be slugged  “MPA Madness”. If you see that phrase, and you’re not interested, skip the post.

—-

One more try

Will state marine protections save Children’s Pool for pinnipeds?

By Eric Wolff

If the seals of La Jolla could follow the news, they’d be packing their extra fish into cardboard boxes about now and checking craigslist for a nice rental rock in Monterey or Santa Barbara. They would know that, by now, the courts have spoken, and their fate is practically sealed: The city has already hired a consultant to do the environmental study on the effects of dredging and cleaning the sand in Children’s Pool.
For more than a decade, harbor seals have had full use of the beach at Children’s Pool for birthing and raising their pups from May to December. Federal and local laws protected them from human interference, and a seawall protected them from stormy waters. People took to strolling out on the wall just to stare at them, and before long they were a tourist attraction.
However, Ellen Browning Scripps’ purpose in building the seawall in 1931 was to create a safe haven for juvenile humans, not seals. When the seals took up residence, their excrement fouled sand and surf. Animal feces tends to create an unhealthy environment for children. In 2004, some San Diegans took the city to court to compel them to dredge and clean the sand, a move that would simultaneously make it less habitable for seals and safer for the kids. In 2005, a judge agreed with them, and in June of this year, an appeals court agreed with the judge. The seals’ days in La Jolla are numbered, and that number is 548.
Then again, the seals have some extremely dedicated defenders, people committed to preserving Children’s Pool as a seal maternity ward. The Friends of the La Jolla Seals, having been beaten up and down the judicial system, realized they have another option: Thet think they can take advantage of a 1999 law only now being implemented that will create a series of marine parks and preserves up and down the California coast.

Click here to read the rest of this story.


Carnival of the Blue #13

June 2, 2008

Carnival of the Blue is one year old! Check out Carnival of the Blue #13 hosted by its daddy, blogfish. (Somehow TOG got scorned, but it’s ok. I have a voodoo doll of Mark Powell riiiight here.)


Carnival of the Blue #12

May 7, 2008

Carnival of the Blue #12 is up at the Island of Doubt. More ocean awesomeness than you can measure with an 100 meter transect tape!


Welcome to the Oyster’s Garter

August 27, 2007

So a journalist and a biologist walked into a bar. The journalist was cheery and had faith in the power of human innovation, while the biologist was cynical and expected (ok, expects) the world to end unpleasantly any day now. Some time, two cats, and several hundred books later, they got married and moved to San Diego.

But the nerdiness was too much for just one apartment. It could not be contained. It needed to be shared with the world. So we, Miriam and Eric, have started this blog to track science & technology developments, especially here in San Diego.

The name comes from a series of 1920s slang we heard on the NPR show A Way With Words – the cat’s pajamas, the bee’s knees, the snake’s hips…and apparently the oyster’s garter. No bivalves have yet been harmed in the creation of this blog, but we’re not making any promises.